- Clippertoday
- Compare
- S1c vs Muvi KX-1
EZVIZ S1c vs Veho Muvi KX-1
What S1c does better (1) and where Muvi KX-1 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
S1cMuvi KX-1
| S1c | Muvi KX-1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 58 mm | 40 mm | +18 mm |
| Width | 20.6 mm | 52 mm | −31.4 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 26 mm | +19 mm |
| Weight | 100 g | 67 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S1c better than Muvi KX-1?
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.8″+11%
Why is Muvi KX-1 better than S1c?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Weight100 g vs 67 g+49%
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)50 fps vs 60 fps+20%
- Depth45 mm vs 26 mm+73%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 67 g |
| Width | 20.6 mm | 52 mm |
| Height | 58 mm | 40 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 50 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.33″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.8″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
