- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACW-5054 vs AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD
Denver ACW-5054 vs Lipa AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD
What ACW-5054 does better (0) and where AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Video8.0
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Why is ACW-5054 better than AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD?
ACW-5054 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD better than ACW-5054?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 240 fps4×
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 24 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 100 g |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/1.3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.77″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 24 MP |
| Max field of view | 140° | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
