- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Vision DUO vs Full HD Pro WiFi V2
Easypix Vision DUO vs Jamara Full HD Pro WiFi V2
What Vision DUO does better (3) and where Full HD Pro WiFi V2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Photo6.6
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Vision DUOFull HD Pro WiFi V2
| Vision DUO | Full HD Pro WiFi V2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43 mm | 55 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 84 mm | −24 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 86 mm | −55 mm |
| Weight | 68 g | 58 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Vision DUO better than Full HD Pro WiFi V2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
- Depth31 mm vs 86 mm2.8×
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%
Why is Full HD Pro WiFi V2 better than Vision DUO?
- Weight68 g vs 58 g+17%
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 68 g | 58 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 84 mm |
| Height | 43 mm | 55 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 86 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
