- Clippertoday
- Compare
- S1c vs 372
EZVIZ S1c vs Rollei 372
What S1c does better (4) and where 372 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
S1c372
| S1c | 372 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 58 mm | 41.8 mm | +16.2 mm |
| Width | 20.6 mm | 60 mm | −39.4 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 30.4 mm | +14.6 mm |
| Weight | 100 g | 60 g | +40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S1c better than 372?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 720p
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 1 MP8×
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 80 min+50%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)50 fps vs 30 fps+67%
Why is 372 better than S1c?
- Weight100 g vs 60 g+66%
- Depth45 mm vs 30.4 mm+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 60 g |
| Width | 20.6 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 58 mm | 41.8 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 30.4 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 720p |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 50 fps | 30 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.33″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 1 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/3 |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 80 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
