- Clippertoday
- Compare
- CAM27-4K vs 2.0 WiFi
Inovalley CAM27-4K vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What CAM27-4K does better (2) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is CAM27-4K better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.5K
- Max field of view140° vs 116°+21%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than CAM27-4K?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 100 m
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 100 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.5K |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.33″ |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 140° | 116° |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
