- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ONE R Twin vs QooCam EGO
Insta360 ONE R Twin vs Kandao QooCam EGO
What ONE R Twin does better (3) and where QooCam EGO wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Photo5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
ONE R TwinQooCam EGO
| ONE R Twin | QooCam EGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48 mm | 52.8 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 94 mm | −22 mm |
| Depth | 43 mm | 22 mm | +21 mm |
| Weight | 130 g | 160 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ONE R Twin better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 1080p
- Max frame rate (slow motion)200 fps vs 60 fps3.3×
- Weight130 g vs 160 g+23%
Why is QooCam EGO better than ONE R Twin?
- Depth43 mm vs 22 mm+95%
- Battery capacity1,190 mAh vs 1,340 mAh+13%
- Aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 130 g | 160 g |
| Width | 72 mm | 94 mm |
| Height | 48 mm | 52.8 mm |
| Depth | 43 mm | 22 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 200 fps | 60 fps |
| Max video bitrate | 100 Mbps | — |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Max field of view | — | 79° |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2.54″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,190 mAh | 1,340 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 70 min | — |
| Charging time | 65 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
