- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W10.2 vs X-SNAP
Lamax W10.2 vs Nilox X-SNAP
What W10.2 does better (6) and where X-SNAP wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is W10.2 better than X-SNAP?
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 0 m
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 30 fps8×
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 80 min+50%
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 850 mAh+59%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is X-SNAP better than W10.2?
- Weight127 g vs 56 g2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | 56 g |
| Width | 64 mm | — |
| Height | 42 mm | — |
| Depth | 32 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 30 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 4 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 850 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 80 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 256 GB | — |
