- Clippertoday
- Compare
- CAM27-4K vs W10.2
Inovalley CAM27-4K vs Lamax W10.2
What CAM27-4K does better (0) and where W10.2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is CAM27-4K better than W10.2?
CAM27-4K has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is W10.2 better than CAM27-4K?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 12 m
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+50%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 127 g |
| Width | — | 64 mm |
| Height | — | 42 mm |
| Depth | — | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 12 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 240 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Max field of view | 140° | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | — | 1.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 256 GB |
