- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W10.2 vs GA400
Lamax W10.2 vs WOLFANG GA400
What W10.2 does better (2) and where GA400 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is W10.2 better than GA400?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 8 m+50%
Why is GA400 better than W10.2?
GA400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | — |
| Width | 64 mm | — |
| Height | 42 mm | — |
| Depth | 32 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 8 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 256 GB | — |
