- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X3.2 vs ACAM07BK
Lamax X3.2 vs Nedis ACAM07BK
What X3.2 does better (6) and where ACAM07BK wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X3.2ACAM07BK
| X3.2 | ACAM07BK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 29 mm | +15 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 59 mm | +1 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 41 mm | −8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X3.2 better than ACAM07BK?
- Max video resolution2.7K vs 1080p
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 400 mAh3×
- Battery life (recording)135 min vs 90 min+50%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
- Depth33 mm vs 41 mm+24%
Why is ACAM07BK better than X3.2?
ACAM07BK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | — |
| Width | 60 mm | 59 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 29 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.7K | 1080p |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 100° |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 400 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
