- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X3.2 vs X-SNAP
Lamax X3.2 vs Nilox X-SNAP
What X3.2 does better (5) and where X-SNAP wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is X3.2 better than X-SNAP?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 4 MP3×
- Battery life (recording)135 min vs 80 min+69%
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 850 mAh+41%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is X-SNAP better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution2.7K vs 4K
- Weight65 g vs 56 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 56 g |
| Width | 60 mm | — |
| Height | 44 mm | — |
| Depth | 33 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.7K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 4 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 850 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 80 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
