- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X3.2 vs Action One
Lamax X3.2 vs Rollei Action One
What X3.2 does better (2) and where Action One wins (5) — every spec side by side.
7.6Battery6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X3.2Action One
| X3.2 | Action One | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 44.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 64.5 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 30.6 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 116 g | −51 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X3.2 better than Action One?
- Weight65 g vs 116 g+78%
- Battery life (recording)135 min vs 100 min+35%
Why is Action One better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution2.7K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.33″+17%
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 1,300 mAh+8%
- Depth33 mm vs 30.6 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 116 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 64.5 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 44.5 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 30.6 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 5 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.7K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.44″ |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.33″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 1,300 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 100 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
