- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X3.2 vs GA400
Lamax X3.2 vs WOLFANG GA400
What X3.2 does better (1) and where GA400 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is X3.2 better than GA400?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
Why is GA400 better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution2.7K vs 4K
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | — |
| Width | 60 mm | — |
| Height | 44 mm | — |
| Depth | 33 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | — | 8 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.7K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
