- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X9.1 vs Muvi KX-1
Lamax X9.1 vs Veho Muvi KX-1
What X9.1 does better (2) and where Muvi KX-1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9.1Muvi KX-1
| X9.1 | Muvi KX-1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 40 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 52 mm | +8 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 26 mm | +7 mm |
| Weight | 72 g | 67 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9.1 better than Muvi KX-1?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.8″+11%
Why is Muvi KX-1 better than X9.1?
- Weight72 g vs 67 g+7%
- Depth33 mm vs 26 mm+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 72 g | 67 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 52 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 40 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Optischer Bildstabilisator (OIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.8″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
