- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M40R vs AT907
Lipa AT-M40R vs Pora&Co AT907
What AT-M40R does better (2) and where AT907 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is AT-M40R better than AT907?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 30 fps8×
Why is AT907 better than AT-M40R?
AT907 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 30 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | — |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
