- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M40R vs SJ11 Active
Lipa AT-M40R vs SJCAM SJ11 Active
What AT-M40R does better (4) and where SJ11 Active wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Video6.4
9.4Photo4.8
4.2Ruggedness9.6
3.0Features9.0
Why is AT-M40R better than SJ11 Active?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 12 MP2×
- Max field of view170° vs 154°+10%
Why is SJ11 Active better than AT-M40R?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.33″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Width | — | 64.5 mm |
| Height | — | 44.5 mm |
| Depth | — | 30.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.3 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.33″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,300 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.9 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 140 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
