- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M40R vs SJ20
Lipa AT-M40R vs SJCAM SJ20
What AT-M40R does better (5) and where SJ20 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is AT-M40R better than SJ20?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 20 MP+20%
- Max field of view170° vs 154°+10%
Why is SJ20 better than AT-M40R?
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.29″+15%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 370 g |
| Width | — | 70.5 mm |
| Height | — | 55 mm |
| Depth | — | 30 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/1.3 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 154° |
| Lenses | — | 2 |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.29″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 800 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 3 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 60 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
