- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M40R vs GO 2600
Lipa AT-M40R vs Trevi GO 2600
What AT-M40R does better (5) and where GO 2600 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is AT-M40R better than GO 2600?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 20 MP+20%
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is GO 2600 better than AT-M40R?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 21 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 21 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
