- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M40R vs 2.0 WiFi
Lipa AT-M40R vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What AT-M40R does better (2) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is AT-M40R better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution5K vs 2.5K
- Max field of view170° vs 116°+47%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than AT-M40R?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 100 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 100 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | — |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 116° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
