- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C100 vs C400 Pocket
SJCAM C100 vs SJCAM C400 Pocket
What C100 does better (2) and where C400 Pocket wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Video6.8
8.3Battery7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
C100C400 Pocket
| C100 | C400 Pocket | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 26 mm | 32.1 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 68.5 mm | −8.5 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 25.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 54 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C100 better than C400 Pocket?
- Weight40 g vs 54 g+35%
- Depth20 mm vs 25.5 mm+27%
Why is C400 Pocket better than C100?
- Battery life (recording)150 min vs 170 min+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 40 g | 54 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Height | 26 mm | 32.1 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/3 |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | — | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery energy | 2.7 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 150 min | 170 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
