LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. C200 Pro vs C300 Pocket

SJCAM C200 Pro vs SJCAM C300 Pocket

What C200 Pro does better (1) and where C300 Pocket wins (5) — every spec side by side.

SJCAM C200 Pro
SJCAM · 2024C200 Pro
7.7Score
1 advantage≈ $85
Higher score
vs
SJCAM C300 Pocket
SJCAM · 2023C300 Pocket
6.1Score
5 advantages≈ $130
7.8Video6.8
8.0Photo7.3
6.6Ruggedness4.0
3.3Features5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

C200 ProC300 Pocket
68 × 3426.568.5 × 32.125.5
C200 ProC300 PocketDifference
Height34 mm32.1 mm+1.9 mm
Width68 mm68.5 mm−0.5 mm
Depth26.5 mm25.5 mm+1 mm
Weight78 g31 g+47 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C200 Pro better than C300 Pocket?

  1. Waterproof without case5 m vs 0 m

Why is C300 Pocket better than C200 Pro?

  1. Weight78 g vs 31 g2.5×
  2. Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 2,800 mAh2.3×
  3. Main screen size1.3″ vs 1.33″+2%
  4. Max field of view135° vs 154°+14%
  5. Depth26.5 mm vs 25.5 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

SJCAM C200 ProSJCAM C200 Pro≈ $857.7
Design & durability
Weight78 g31 g
Width68 mm68.5 mm
Height34 mm32.1 mm
Depth26.5 mm25.5 mm
Waterproof without case5 m0 m
Waterproof with housing30 m30 m
Ingress protection—IP68
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)30 fps30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps120 fps
HDR videoYes—
H.265 / HEVCYesYes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec)YesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution20 MP20 MP
Aperturef/1.6—
Max field of view135°154°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation system6-Achsen StabilisationGyroskopischer Bildstabilisator
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size1.3″1.33″
TouchscreenYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity1,200 mAh2,800 mAh
Battery energy4.6 Wh—
Battery life (recording)120 min—
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam modeYesYes
Live streaming—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare