- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C200 vs C400 Pocket
SJCAM C200 vs SJCAM C400 Pocket
What C200 does better (2) and where C400 Pocket wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Video6.8
2.2Photo3.4
7.6Ruggedness4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200C400 Pocket
| C200 | C400 Pocket | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 34 mm | 32.1 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 25.5 mm | +1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 better than C400 Pocket?
- Waterproof without case5 m vs 0 m
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
Why is C400 Pocket better than C200?
- 4K frame rate (max)24 fps vs 30 fps+25%
- Depth26.5 mm vs 25.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 54 g |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Height | 34 mm | 32.1 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 60 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 24 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.36″ | — |
| Photo resolution | — | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 154° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.28″ | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 170 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
