- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C300 Pocket vs C400 Pocket
SJCAM C300 Pocket vs SJCAM C400 Pocket
What C300 Pocket does better (4) and where C400 Pocket wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Video6.8
7.3Photo3.4
4.0Ruggedness4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
C300 PocketC400 Pocket
| C300 Pocket | C400 Pocket | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 32.1 mm | 32.1 mm | = |
| Width | 68.5 mm | 68.5 mm | = |
| Depth | 25.5 mm | 25.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 31 g | 54 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C300 Pocket better than C400 Pocket?
- Weight31 g vs 54 g+74%
- Battery capacity2,800 mAh vs 1,250 mAh2.2×
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Main screen size1.33″ vs 1.3″+2%
Why is C400 Pocket better than C300 Pocket?
C400 Pocket has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 31 g | 54 g |
| Width | 68.5 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Height | 32.1 mm | 32.1 mm |
| Depth | 25.5 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 154° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 1.33″ | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,800 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 170 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
