- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C400 vs C400 Pocket
SJCAM C400 vs SJCAM C400 Pocket
What C400 does better (2) and where C400 Pocket wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Video6.8
5.1Photo3.4
4.0Ruggedness4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
C400C400 Pocket
| C400 | C400 Pocket | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 32 mm | 32.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Depth | 25.5 mm | 25.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 54 g | 54 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C400 better than C400 Pocket?
- Main screen size2.29″ vs 1.3″+76%
- Aperturef/2 vs f/3+50%
Why is C400 Pocket better than C400?
C400 Pocket has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 54 g | 54 g |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Height | 32 mm | 32.1 mm |
| Depth | 25.5 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.36″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 154° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation, HorizonSteady | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery energy | 4.8 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 170 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 512 GB | — |
