- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SJ11 Active vs GO 2550 4k
SJCAM SJ11 Active vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What SJ11 Active does better (3) and where GO 2550 4k wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Video4.9
4.8Photo5.2
9.6Ruggedness9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
SJ11 ActiveGO 2550 4k
| SJ11 Active | GO 2550 4k | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44.5 mm | 43 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 64.5 mm | 60 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Depth | 30.5 mm | 31 mm | −0.5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SJ11 Active better than GO 2550 4k?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Main screen size2.33″ vs 2″+17%
- Max field of view154° vs 145°+6%
Why is GO 2550 4k better than SJ11 Active?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 86 g |
| Width | 64.5 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 44.5 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 30.5 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | — |
| Max field of view | 154° | 145° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2.33″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,300 mAh | — |
| Battery energy | 4.9 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 140 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
