- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SJ11 Active vs 2.0 WiFi
SJCAM SJ11 Active vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What SJ11 Active does better (3) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Video2.0
4.8Photo2.8
9.6Ruggedness9.8
8.2Battery7.9
Why is SJ11 Active better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.5K
- Battery capacity1,300 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+30%
- Max field of view154° vs 116°+33%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than SJ11 Active?
- Waterproof without case30 m vs 100 m3.3×
- Battery life (recording)140 min vs 240 min+71%
- Aperturef/2.3 vs f/2+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Width | 64.5 mm | — |
| Height | 44.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 30.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 30 m | 100 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 154° | 116° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2.33″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,300 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery energy | 4.9 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 140 min | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
