- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SJ11 Active vs GA200
SJCAM SJ11 Active vs WOLFANG GA200
What SJ11 Active does better (2) and where GA200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Photo9.4
9.6Ruggedness4.2
9.0Features6.5
Why is SJ11 Active better than GA200?
- Waterproof without case30 m vs 0 m
- Battery capacity1,300 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+24%
Why is GA200 better than SJ11 Active?
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 24 MP2×
- Max field of view154° vs 170°+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Width | 64.5 mm | — |
| Height | 44.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 30.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 30 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 24 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | — |
| Max field of view | 154° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2.33″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,300 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery energy | 4.9 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 140 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
