- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SJ11 Active vs GA300
SJCAM SJ11 Active vs WOLFANG GA300
What SJ11 Active does better (2) and where GA300 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Video6.4
4.8Photo8.3
9.6Ruggedness4.2
Why is SJ11 Active better than GA300?
- Waterproof without case30 m vs 0 m
- Main screen size2.33″ vs 2″+17%
Why is GA300 better than SJ11 Active?
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
- Battery capacity1,300 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+4%
- Max field of view154° vs 170°+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Width | 64.5 mm | — |
| Height | 44.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 30.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 30 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | — |
| Max field of view | 154° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2.33″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,300 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery energy | 4.9 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 140 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
