- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SJ4000 Dual Screen vs GO 2550 4k
SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What SJ4000 Dual Screen does better (1) and where GO 2550 4k wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Video4.9
6.6Photo5.2
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
SJ4000 Dual ScreenGO 2550 4k
| SJ4000 Dual Screen | GO 2550 4k | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 59.2 mm | 43 mm | +16.2 mm |
| Width | 29.8 mm | 60 mm | −30.2 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 31 mm | +10 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than GO 2550 4k?
- Max field of view170° vs 145°+17%
Why is GO 2550 4k better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Depth41 mm vs 31 mm+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 86 g |
| Width | 29.8 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 59.2 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 145° |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
