LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. SJ4000 Dual Screen vs GA400

SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen vs WOLFANG GA400

What SJ4000 Dual Screen does better (1) and where GA400 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
SJCAM · 2023SJ4000 Dual Screen
5.8Score
1 advantage≈ $45
vs
WOLFANG GA400
WOLFANG · 2023GA400
8.9Score
4 advantages
Higher score
4.9Video6.4
6.6Photo8.3
4.2Ruggedness7.6

Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than GA400?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×

Why is GA400 better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?

  1. Waterproof without case0 m vs 8 m
  2. 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  3. Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+50%
  4. Photo resolution16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Design & durability
Width29.8 mm—
Height59.2 mm—
Depth41 mm—
Waterproof without case0 m8 m
Waterproof with housing30 m—
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)30 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps60 fps
H.265 / HEVCYes—
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution16 MP20 MP
Max field of view170°170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation system—6-Achsen Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisation—Yes
Screens
Front screenYes—
Main screen size—2″
TouchscreenYesYes
Audio
External microphone supportYes—
Battery
Battery capacity900 mAh1,350 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam modeYesYes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare