- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 2.0 WiFi vs S6
Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi vs XTU S6
What 2.0 WiFi does better (1) and where S6 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than S6?
- Battery life (recording)240 min vs 150 min+60%
Why is S6 better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution2.5K vs 4K
- Max field of view116° vs 170°+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 100 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 30 fps |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.33″ | — |
| Photo resolution | — | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | 116° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | SuperSmooth 4.0 |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Front screen size | — | 1.4″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 240 min | 150 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
