- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 360° vs V50 X Cube
AKASO 360° vs AKASO V50 X Cube
What 360° does better (4) and where V50 X Cube wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Video3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
360°V50 X Cube
| 360° | V50 X Cube | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47 mm | 45 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 109 mm | 53.7 mm | +55.3 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 37.9 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 100 g | +80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 360° better than V50 X Cube?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 4K
- Photo resolution48 MP vs 20 MP2.4×
- Main screen size2.29″ vs 2.1″+9%
- Depth31 mm vs 37.9 mm+22%
Why is V50 X Cube better than 360°?
- Weight180 g vs 100 g+80%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 100 g |
| Width | 109 mm | 53.7 mm |
| Height | 47 mm | 45 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 37.9 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 21 m |
| Min operating temperature | — | -5 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 45 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 30 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Max field of view | 360° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Subject tracking | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 2.1″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,050 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Timecode sync | — | Yes |
