- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 360° vs QooCam 3
AKASO 360° vs Kandao QooCam 3
What 360° does better (3) and where QooCam 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
360°QooCam 3
| 360° | QooCam 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47 mm | 82.7 mm | −35.7 mm |
| Width | 109 mm | 71.5 mm | +37.5 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 26.6 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 201 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 360° better than QooCam 3?
- Photo resolution48 MP vs 6 MP8.4×
- Weight180 g vs 201 g+12%
- Main screen size2.29″ vs 1.9″+21%
Why is QooCam 3 better than 360°?
- Sensor size (optical format)0.5″ vs 0.64″+29%
- Aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.6+41%
- Depth31 mm vs 26.6 mm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 201 g |
| Width | 109 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Height | 47 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 26.6 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 10 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 5.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.55" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | 0.64″ |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | 6 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.6 |
| Max field of view | 360° | 360° |
| RAW photos | — | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Subject tracking | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 1.9″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,600 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 50 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
