- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 360° vs Theta X 2023
AKASO 360° vs Ricoh Theta X 2023
What 360° does better (1) and where Theta X 2023 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Video7.7
6.6Photo5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
360°Theta X 2023
| 360° | Theta X 2023 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47 mm | 136.2 mm | −89.2 mm |
| Width | 109 mm | 51.7 mm | +57.3 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 29 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 170 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 360° better than Theta X 2023?
- Aperturef/2.2 vs f/2.4+7%
Why is Theta X 2023 better than 360°?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 8K
- Weight180 g vs 170 g+6%
- Depth31 mm vs 29 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 170 g |
| Width | 109 mm | 51.7 mm |
| Height | 47 mm | 136.2 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 29 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 8K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 120 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 120 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | 0.5″ |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Max field of view | 360° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Subject tracking | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 2.25″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 55 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
