- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 360° vs QooCam EGO
AKASO 360° vs Kandao QooCam EGO
What 360° does better (2) and where QooCam EGO wins (4) — every spec side by side.
6.6Photo5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
360°QooCam EGO
| 360° | QooCam EGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47 mm | 52.8 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Width | 109 mm | 94 mm | +15 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 22 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 160 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 360° better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 1080p
- Max field of view360° vs 79°4.6×
Why is QooCam EGO better than 360°?
- Weight180 g vs 160 g+12%
- Main screen size2.29″ vs 2.54″+11%
- Depth31 mm vs 22 mm+41%
- Aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 160 g |
| Width | 109 mm | 94 mm |
| Height | 47 mm | 52.8 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 22 mm |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 1080p |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Max field of view | 360° | 79° |
| RAW photos | — | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Subject tracking | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 2.54″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,340 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
