LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. 360° vs QooCam FUN

AKASO 360° vs Kandao QooCam FUN

What 360° does better (2) and where QooCam FUN wins (3) — every spec side by side.

AKASO 360°
AKASO · 2025360°
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ $220
vs
Kandao QooCam FUN
Kandao · 2021QooCam FUN
7.0Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
5.0Video3.8
6.6Photo9.0

Why is 360° better than QooCam FUN?

  1. Max video resolution5.7K vs 2.5K
  2. Max field of view360° vs 200°+80%

Why is QooCam FUN better than 360°?

  1. Weight180 g vs 70 g2.6×
  2. Sensor size (optical format)0.5″ vs 1″2×
  3. Aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.9+20%
Specifications

Side by side

AKASO 360°AKASO 360°≈ $2206.4
Design & durability
Weight180 g70 g
Width109 mm—
Height47 mm—
Depth31 mm—
Video
Max video resolution5.7K2.5K
4K frame rate (max)—30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)—30 fps
H.265 / HEVCYes—
Sensor & photo
Sensor size1/2"1"
Sensor size (optical format)0.5″1″
Photo resolution48 MP—
Aperturef/2.2f/1.9
Max field of view360°200°
Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisation—Yes
360° horizon lockYes—
Subject trackingYes—
Screens
Main screen size2.29″—
TouchscreenYes—
Battery
Battery capacity—920 mAh
Battery life (recording)—80 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYes—
GPSYes—
Storage & features
microSD card slotYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare