- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 360° vs PanoX V2
AKASO 360° vs Labpano PanoX V2
What 360° does better (1) and where PanoX V2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
360°PanoX V2
| 360° | PanoX V2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47 mm | 50 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 109 mm | 134 mm | −25 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 20 mm | +11 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 200 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 360° better than PanoX V2?
- Weight180 g vs 200 g+11%
Why is PanoX V2 better than 360°?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 8K
- Photo resolution48 MP vs 72 MP+50%
- Main screen size2.29″ vs 3″+31%
- Depth31 mm vs 20 mm+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 200 g |
| Width | 109 mm | 134 mm |
| Height | 47 mm | 50 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 20 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 8K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 60 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | 0.5″ |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | 72 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Max field of view | 360° | 360° |
| RAW photos | — | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Subject tracking | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
