- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 360° vs PilotPano
AKASO 360° vs Labpano PilotPano
What 360° does better (4) and where PilotPano wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
360°PilotPano
| 360° | PilotPano | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47 mm | 54.5 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Width | 109 mm | 138 mm | −29 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 45.7 mm | −14.7 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 295 g | −115 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 360° better than PilotPano?
- Weight180 g vs 295 g+64%
- Sensor size (optical format)0.5″ vs 0.44″+15%
- Max field of view360° vs 210°+71%
- Depth31 mm vs 45.7 mm+47%
Why is PilotPano better than 360°?
- Main screen size2.29″ vs 3.1″+35%
- Aperturef/2.2 vs f/2+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 295 g |
| Width | 109 mm | 138 mm |
| Height | 47 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 45.7 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 5.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 60 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | 0.44″ |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 360° | 210° |
| RAW photos | — | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Subject tracking | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 3.1″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 2,300 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
