- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 360° vs XSNAP2
AKASO 360° vs Nilox XSNAP2
What 360° does better (5) and where XSNAP2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is 360° better than XSNAP2?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 4K
- Sensor size (optical format)0.5″ vs 0.25″2×
- Photo resolution48 MP vs 8 MP6×
- Max field of view360° vs 170°2.1×
- Main screen size2.29″ vs 2″+15%
Why is XSNAP2 better than 360°?
- Weight180 g vs 56 g3.2×
- Aperturef/2.2 vs f/2+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 56 g |
| Width | 109 mm | — |
| Height | 47 mm | — |
| Depth | 31 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/4" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | 0.25″ |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 360° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Subject tracking | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
