- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACW-5054 vs SJ4000 Dual Screen
Denver ACW-5054 vs SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
What ACW-5054 does better (0) and where SJ4000 Dual Screen wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Video4.9
6.1Photo6.6
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Why is ACW-5054 better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?
ACW-5054 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than ACW-5054?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Max field of view140° vs 170°+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Width | — | 29.8 mm |
| Height | — | 59.2 mm |
| Depth | — | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/1.3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.77″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 140° | 170° |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
