- Clippertoday
- Compare
- S1c vs HERO
EZVIZ S1c vs GoPro HERO
What S1c does better (1) and where HERO wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
S1cHERO
| S1c | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 58 mm | 47.7 mm | +10.3 mm |
| Width | 20.6 mm | 56.6 mm | −36 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 29.4 mm | +15.6 mm |
| Weight | 100 g | 86 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S1c better than HERO?
- Min operating temperature-20 °C vs -10 °C+-50%
Why is HERO better than S1c?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 10 m
- Weight100 g vs 86 g+16%
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 123 min+2%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)50 fps vs 60 fps+20%
- Depth45 mm vs 29.4 mm+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 86 g |
| Width | 20.6 mm | 56.6 mm |
| Height | 58 mm | 47.7 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 29.4 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 10 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | -10 °C |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 50 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.33″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | — |
| Aperture | — | f/2.3 |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 123 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Voice control | — | Yes |
