- Clippertoday
- Compare
- CAM27-4K vs X3.2
Inovalley CAM27-4K vs Lamax X3.2
What CAM27-4K does better (1) and where X3.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is CAM27-4K better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
Why is X3.2 better than CAM27-4K?
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+33%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 65 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 44 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 12 MP |
| Max field of view | 140° | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
