- Clippertoday
- Compare
- CAM27-4K vs SJ4000 Dual Screen
Inovalley CAM27-4K vs SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
What CAM27-4K does better (0) and where SJ4000 Dual Screen wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Why is CAM27-4K better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?
CAM27-4K has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than CAM27-4K?
- Max field of view140° vs 170°+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Width | — | 29.8 mm |
| Height | — | 59.2 mm |
| Depth | — | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 140° | 170° |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
