- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ONE R Twin vs QooCam FUN
Insta360 ONE R Twin vs Kandao QooCam FUN
What ONE R Twin does better (4) and where QooCam FUN wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Video3.8
3.4Photo9.0
4.8Battery5.1
Why is ONE R Twin better than QooCam FUN?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 2.5K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)200 fps vs 30 fps6.7×
- Battery capacity1,190 mAh vs 920 mAh+29%
Why is QooCam FUN better than ONE R Twin?
- Weight130 g vs 70 g+86%
- Battery life (recording)70 min vs 80 min+14%
- Aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 130 g | 70 g |
| Width | 72 mm | — |
| Height | 48 mm | — |
| Depth | 43 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 200 fps | 30 fps |
| Max video bitrate | 100 Mbps | — |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 1″ |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Max field of view | — | 200° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,190 mAh | 920 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 70 min | 80 min |
| Charging time | 65 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
