- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition vs QooCam EGO
Insta360 ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition vs Kandao QooCam EGO
What ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition does better (1) and where QooCam EGO wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
ONE RS 1-Inch 360 EditionQooCam EGO
| ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition | QooCam EGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 129.3 mm | 52.8 mm | +76.5 mm |
| Width | 53.2 mm | 94 mm | −40.8 mm |
| Depth | 49.5 mm | 22 mm | +27.5 mm |
| Weight | 239 g | 160 g | +79 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution6K vs 1080p
Why is QooCam EGO better than ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition?
- Weight239 g vs 160 g+49%
- Depth49.5 mm vs 22 mm2.2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)50 fps vs 60 fps+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 239 g | 160 g |
| Width | 53.2 mm | 94 mm |
| Height | 129.3 mm | 52.8 mm |
| Depth | 49.5 mm | 22 mm |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 6K | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 50 fps | 60 fps |
| Max video bitrate | 120 Mbps | — |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Max field of view | — | 79° |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-axis Gyroscope | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2.54″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,340 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 62 min | — |
| Charging time | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
