- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam EGO vs PilotPano
Kandao QooCam EGO vs Labpano PilotPano
What QooCam EGO does better (3) and where PilotPano wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Photo2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
QooCam EGOPilotPano
| QooCam EGO | PilotPano | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52.8 mm | 54.5 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 94 mm | 138 mm | −44 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 45.7 mm | −23.7 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 295 g | −135 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is QooCam EGO better than PilotPano?
- Weight160 g vs 295 g+84%
- Depth22 mm vs 45.7 mm2.1×
- Aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
Why is PilotPano better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 5.7K
- Battery capacity1,340 mAh vs 2,300 mAh+72%
- Max field of view79° vs 210°2.7×
- Main screen size2.54″ vs 3.1″+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 295 g |
| Width | 94 mm | 138 mm |
| Height | 52.8 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 45.7 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 5.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.44″ |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 79° | 210° |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.54″ | 3.1″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,340 mAh | 2,300 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
