- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam EGO vs QooCam FUN
Kandao QooCam EGO vs Kandao QooCam FUN
What QooCam EGO does better (3) and where QooCam FUN wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Photo9.0
Why is QooCam EGO better than QooCam FUN?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Battery capacity1,340 mAh vs 920 mAh+46%
- Aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+4%
Why is QooCam FUN better than QooCam EGO?
- Weight160 g vs 70 g2.3×
- Max video resolution1080p vs 2.5K
- Max field of view79° vs 200°2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 70 g |
| Width | 94 mm | — |
| Height | 52.8 mm | — |
| Depth | 22 mm | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 1″ |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Max field of view | 79° | 200° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.54″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,340 mAh | 920 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 80 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
