- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam EGO vs PanoX V2
Kandao QooCam EGO vs Labpano PanoX V2
What QooCam EGO does better (1) and where PanoX V2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Photo7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
QooCam EGOPanoX V2
| QooCam EGO | PanoX V2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52.8 mm | 50 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Width | 94 mm | 134 mm | −40 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 20 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 200 g | −40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is QooCam EGO better than PanoX V2?
- Weight160 g vs 200 g+25%
Why is PanoX V2 better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 8K
- Max field of view79° vs 360°4.6×
- Main screen size2.54″ vs 3″+18%
- Depth22 mm vs 20 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 200 g |
| Width | 94 mm | 134 mm |
| Height | 52.8 mm | 50 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 20 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 8K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.5″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 72 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Max field of view | 79° | 360° |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.54″ | 3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,340 mAh | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
