- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam EGO vs Pocket
Kandao QooCam EGO vs PnJ Pocket
What QooCam EGO does better (3) and where Pocket wins (3) — every spec side by side.
5.2Photo2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
QooCam EGOPocket
| QooCam EGO | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52.8 mm | 38 mm | +14.8 mm |
| Width | 94 mm | 129.5 mm | −35.5 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 41.5 mm | −19.5 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 134 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is QooCam EGO better than Pocket?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Depth22 mm vs 41.5 mm+89%
- Aperturef/1.8 vs f/3+67%
Why is Pocket better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Weight160 g vs 134 g+19%
- Battery capacity1,340 mAh vs 1,600 mAh+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 134 g |
| Width | 94 mm | 129.5 mm |
| Height | 52.8 mm | 38 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 41.5 mm |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 79° | — |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | 3-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.54″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,340 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 140 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
