- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam EGO vs Theta X
Kandao QooCam EGO vs Ricoh Theta X
What QooCam EGO does better (3) and where Theta X wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Photo6.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
QooCam EGOTheta X
| QooCam EGO | Theta X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52.8 mm | 136.2 mm | −83.4 mm |
| Width | 94 mm | 51.7 mm | +42.3 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 29 mm | −7 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 144 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is QooCam EGO better than Theta X?
- Main screen size2.54″ vs 2.25″+13%
- Aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.4+33%
- Depth22 mm vs 29 mm+32%
Why is Theta X better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 5.7K
- Weight160 g vs 144 g+11%
- Max field of view79° vs 360°4.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 144 g |
| Width | 94 mm | 51.7 mm |
| Height | 52.8 mm | 136.2 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 29 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 5.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.5″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.4 |
| Max field of view | 79° | 360° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.54″ | 2.25″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,340 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 55 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
